Saturday, May 30, 2015

Zero Tolerance ZT0566 Review

And now, we have played out the thread.  This is as far as the Hinderer obsession will go.  I am sure in the future I will probably want something else he designed, but for now, this is it...the last one I'll review until it isn't.  The ZT0566 isn't a bad knife by any means, but its value proposition, its design, its choice of materials...all of them are in service to something else other than the task of cutting or the consumer, unless that consumer happens to be an ardent Hinderer fan boy.  This isn't a budget XM-18 3", this is a collection of Hinderer design tropes mushed together on a single knife.  It will cut, it will stand up to some thrashing, and it doesn't look bad, but there are a slew of better ways to spend your money.  In many ways, this is a more dispiriting product than the Kershaw Cryo.  At least there we knew it was a budget rendition.  But here, compared to other ZT Hinderers like the very good ZT0560 and the even better ZT0562 this knife just seems like KAI USA is going through the motions, spitting out a design, collecting dough, and moving on.   This is the car the car salesman brings you BEFORE they up sell you to the nicer version--it hits all of your requirements but does so with so little panache that you almost fall asleep merely being around it.  And in this the Golden Age of Gear, we are at point where you can rightfully expect performance, materials, AND panache.

Here is the product page. The 0566 costs around $140 shipped (I found one for $129 on Amazon, but shipping was $13...ooo you sneaky bastards). There is a special edition with carbon fiber handles and an M390 blade.  That looks like a better knife than this one. Here is a written review. Here is a video review (like me some Apostle P videos). Here is a link to Knives Ship Free, where you can find the ZT0566, and all proceeds benefit the site when you purchase things through this link:

KnivesShipFree
 
Here is my review sample (to be given away):

P1050417

My video overview:



Twitter Review Summary:  You can do better.

Design: 1

Its a Hinderer.  Its a ZT.  And it is mostly pocketable.  That alone is a good combination.  Its not really fair to deduct points from a superior design simply because it has been done before (MANY MANY times before).  Despite the score though, this is not a knife you'll get excited about.  You know EXACTLY what your getting.  There is no moment of excitement and anticipation as the knife slides out of the box.  This is as predictably boring as party politics--everything is scripted and locked down.

P1050858

But there are places where it is fair to deduct points.  The choice of materials is pretty terrible for a ZT.  This is a ZT in name and steel only.  The lock side is made of stainless steel, not titanium, the only in-production ZT with that distinction.  The show side is G10 which is functional but not exciting.  The steel is Elmax, which is quite good, but aside from that, the 0566 is IDENTICAL to the Cryo.  Same handle materials, same clip, same bolts, same everything.  Its basically a bigger Cryo with Elmax.  That, in my opinion, is not worth $100 price premium.  The G10 Cryo is actually quite a good little knife.  Making it bigger just makes it boring.  Making it bigger and $100 more is a pricing decision that is either greedy or designed to test the intelligence of the knife buying public.  Note that the M390 version runs carbon fiber so there is at least some iteration of this knife that's not Cryo Plus.

The ratios are what you'd expect from a knife this big with steel handles.  The b:h is .73, which is not bad for a bigger knife.  The b:w is an atrocious .61.  How bad is that?  REALLY bad.   The Cryo SS was .55, which I think is the record low, but this boat anchor is second. 

P1050615

Fit and Finish: 1

ZT has fit and finish dialed in, as I mentioned before.  You can see that a lot of the "first inspection" things, like blade centering:

P1050864

are dead on perfect.  But there are things that can't be photographed that aren't.  There are issues with the lock that I will cover below, but the big issue here is that the torsion bar in the handle rattles.  Its not a little bit of rattle, its a lot.  And the worst part is that it rattles when you are making medium to high effort cuts.  In other words this thing is a noise maker like 60% of the time. If it were just the rattling torsion bar I'd be okay and probably keep things at a 2, but that combined with the lock issue means that fit and finish is not up to the usual ZT level.  What's weirder is the fact that on the similarly made and priced ZT0770, everything was JUST right.

Grip: 2

The ZT0560 was a behemoth, a true pocket sword, even though it had a "modest" 3.75 inch blade.  Its girth was...insert your own innuendo here.  And while that made for a great knife to hold and use, it was a bear in the pocket.  Not so with the ZT0566.  Hinderer's basic design, even the ZT echo of that blueprint, is so solid and fundamentally good and that goodness starts with the handle and the grip.  The ZT0566 is no different from any of the other dozen or so Hinderers in that regard.  

P1050859

Its great in the hand.

Carry: 1

Okay, so I will honest and tell you that I think this is like a 1.5, but in the end, the weight of this knife is just too much for what you get.  The Paramilitary 2 is about a quarter inch longer and almost 2 ounces lighter.  Th large Cold Steel Voyager, with its 4 inch blade, is 4.6 ounces.  The ZT0770 is 2.3 ounces lighter, with the same materials made by the same company for roughly the same price.  I could keep going forever as this knife is just too heavy.  The steel lock side and the steel liner make this thing a porker.  And so, despite its more modest size, its too portly for me, especially in light of the blade length. 

Steel: 2

I wrote about piece on AllOutdoor about how difficult it is to be really precise in evaluating steels and this was in large part a response to the rampant backyard tester/bro science that is out there.  These "scientists" focused their collective wrath on Elmax a while back and despite their proclamations, I have yet to have a problem with Elmax.  I think at this point I have reviewed almost a dozen blades with the steel and I have no problems.  Its a great steel.  I like it quite a bit.  

Blade Shape: 2

Like with almost all Hinderers, the ZT0566 has a fundamentally solid blade shape.  No complaints here.  

Grind: 1

Oh, but wait, there are complaints here.  The edge on this knife is not very thin and the result is that the ZT0566 is a poor slicer.  And here is the real deal--you are 1,000 times more likely to need a folder for slicing tasks than you are to need it to baton through wood.  It just doesn't happen.  Given the real world use of a knife, I'd strongly prefer a thinner blade than a thicker one.  That said, even if you want thick blade stock, like on the Paramilitary 2, it should really be thinned out.  There is simply no excuse leaving the edge this thick.  The...well you can probably guess...ZT0770 is just as thick, but sliced far better because the blade behind the edge was correctly profiled and ground thin.  

Deployment Method: 0

I am done with assisted opener.  If they are done VERY well, I am okay with it, but I think, given the rattle, which may presage actual impaired function, I am done.  Gimme a bearing pivot any day.  Or heck, just a good washer-based flipper.  I know they sell, and in the end, companies make knives to sell them, but from a consumer point of view, assists aren't worth the hassle.  

Retention Method: 2

I sung the praises of this clip when it was on the Cryo and it is still good.  Either this clip or one of the two over the top designs from Benchmade are about the best you can get.  Why Buck doesn't use the Vantage clip more often is beyond me.  Its a winner too.  

Lock: 1

More proof that this is not a REAL ZT--the lock on my model is wiggly.  Not like afraid-I'll-lose-a-finger wiggly, but much more than you'd expect from ZT.  

P1050856

Oddly enough I also found some engagement issues.  Sometimes it would just stick in there and other times it seemed to wander in behind the blade and just hang on, not really putting any pressure on the blade whatsoever.  

P1050861

Not a fan.  

Overall Score: 13 out of 20

If you are a Hinderer fanboy and the 0562 or 0560 are too big, save your pennies and buy a 3" XM-18.  If you can't save or don't want to spend that much on a knife buy the G-10 Cryo.  If that's too small by the Cryo 2.  If those don't work then pick between this knife and the Thermite.  There is no way around it, when it comes to KAI'd Hinderers this one is well down the list for me. 

Don't believe the labels and logos--this is a Kershaw in every way except the steel.  The assist sucks for all of the reasons assists suck, and proving their inferiority this one rattles like a baby toy.  But for all of my boo hoo-ing over this knife it is still a pretty solid offering.  The problem is that is just not competitive.  The 0770 is a much better knife than this and it is the same price.  I just can't get behind the ZT0566.  This knife is the sign that they have sliced the baloney too thin on the Hinderer design trope.

And to KAI USA, yes I know that this knife sells well and that assists sell well.  But sales alone do not make a product a great product for the consumer. When it sells well for 50 years like the Buck 110 or 25 years like the Sebenza, we'll talk.  Until then sales numbers are more associated with good marketing than emblematic of good design.  It might be a great product for KAI USA, but consumers can do better at this price point, within the ZT line or outside it.

As it is, this is my last Hinderer for a while--after the 560, 562, and THREE Cryo reviews.

Competition

Its called the ZT0770.  Its better in every way. 

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Wounded Warrior Project May 2015 Giveaway Winners

Here we go (winners brought to you by Random.org when appropriate):

a) EDC Kit #1: chosen at random.

--James Chapter Knife, Storm Trooper Colorway (courtesy of the blog)
--Prometheus Beta QR v2 (Scout Leather Polished Brass Edition)(courtesy of Prometheus)
--RC Fibers D15 Wallet and CF Clip (courtesy of RC Fibers)
--TT Keeper OPMT (courtesy of TT PockeTTools)
--Karas Kustoms Ink (courtesy of Karas Kustoms)
--Mini Mechanics chest EDC storage (courtesy of the blog)



WINNER: Ryan Morris


b) EDC Kit #2: chosen at random.  Kit #2 includes:

--Zero Tolerance ZT770CF (courtesy of www.knivesshipfree.com)
--Malkoff MDC (courtesy of the blog)
--Bellroy  Elements Pocket (courtesy of Bellroy)
--Prometheus EKO OMPT (courtesy of Prometheus)


WINNER: Adam Sullivan


c) Big Heart, awarded to the person with the single largest donation:
--One of a kind, Smock Knives modded Boker Kwaiken with Dietz Flipper (courtesy of the blog)
 
WINNER: John Bengino (who not only gave a lot, but also used the Price is Right Trick--you clever bastard you).
 
d) Big Heart, runner up 
 
--Customized Emerson Mini CQC7 (courtesy of Attorney Adrian)
 
WINNER: Duane Kuykendall
 
e) Big Heart, second runner up
 
--CRKT No Time Off (courtesy of CRKT)
 
WINNER: Matt Distefano
 
Weekly Big Giver:
 
Week 1: Kershaw Amplitude: John Bengino
Week 2: Spyderco Cat: Gary Morrison
Week 3: Lynch Paramilitary Upgrade Kit: Duane Kuykendall

Vet: 
 
--Zero Tolerance ZT0562 (courtesy of Knives Ship Free)
--Arno Bernard Bush Baby (courtesy of Knives Ship Free)
 
WINNER: Emily Domeyer (technically Jacob Domeyer on behalf of his wife Emily who is currently in the Middle East).  I will pay for shipping to wherever Emily is stationed.
 
Cheap Skate: 
 
--Buck Mini Spitfire
 
WINNER: Daniel Van Natta

So there you have it, all of the winners.  By the way here is some of the data:

We had 27 entries.  The quite a few gave $100 or more--5 to be precise.  The total raised was $1141, making the average donation around $42...pretty fucking amazing.  We have raised almost $3,000 thus far--$1800 plus $1141.  And if you didn't win anything you still won because you helped those that keep us safe.  And be ready for next time.  I have something HUGE planned.   

All of these folks please contact me and send your addresses.  Email is everydaycommentary at gmail dot com (in the usual format).  I'd like to mail out everything at once, probably on Friday or Saturday, so don't delay.  

One last piece of WWP Giveaway business--why I still support WWP.  

So a reader sent me a link to this post over at ITS as to why they no longer support the WWP.  I myself have had issues with the WWP (see below), but I continue to run the giveaways to support this charity because, as of 2015, there is no charity that does more for veterans than they do.  It is a purely utilitarian calculus--they are the biggest, they have the most resources, they have the most money.  They may not be the best run and they certainly could do better, but if I waited for the perfect charity, I'd be waiting forever.

That said I want your input.  What other charity should I support with the giveaways (don't bother with pet or animal charities...they'll get my attention when all of the people problems are solved)?

For your benefit here is the ITS post and my responses to the reader who sent me the link:

I did some further digging and here is what I found with regard to ITS objections to the WWP:

1.  The CEO is paid too much.

Based on reviews on Charity Navigator, he is paid quite a bit, but not that much more, on either a percentage basis or in real terms, compared to CEOs at similarly sized charities.  I guess this means that it takes money to make money. 

On a personal note I have been involved with a few charities--fund raising, boards, and strategic plans and I can tell you that the successful ones are the ones that have charismatic or well-connected CEOs.  Those that don't do very poorly in fundraising.  My Dad runs a charity for a living, his second job after leaving the Air Force, and while he makes nothing like what the CEO for WWP does, he works hard and earns his money.  Finding hard working, charismatic, and well-connected people doesn't come cheap.

As far as this is concerned, I am okay with the CEO's pay.

2.  Too much of the money goes to overhead.

The percentage of money that goes to the cause is around 58%.  ITS highlights other vet charities that do much better, but its not really comparing apples to apples.  ITS's vet charities are tiny compared to WWP.  After digging through the numbers on Charity Navigator I found that almost all large charities, say those with revenue over $200,000,000 have more overhead, as a percentage of their total operating budget, than small charities.  The Smithsonian has 70% going to the cause and the Nature Conservancy has about the same.  Both are much larger than WWP and both can off set normal charity revenue streams with government aid.  In fact, all of the big charities, American Red Cross, St. Judes, the Jimmy Fund, Smithsonian, and NC all get direct or indirect government aid.  That money is basically free, from a charity's perspective, and requires little or no overhead, maybe one or two people to do grant writing.  Without that revenue stream, charities as big as WWP, have similarly sized overhead expenses percentages.

3.  WWP is suing small charities.

ITS specious legal analysis aside, this is one thing that really irks me.  This is some seriously petty shit, but it is not out of line with the stupid thinking I encountered when I dealt with WWP directly.  I contacted WWP when I originally started the giveaways and they were not helpful.  They wanted me to pay $750 to them so they could "advertise" the giveaway on their site and send me a packet of stickers and the like.  I explained to them what I was planning on doing and how that much money would eat away all of the profits and after some back and forth, they gave me their blessing but told me I wouldn't get any visibility or their "fundraiser" packet.  I said okay and I have  been doing the giveaway ever since.  They operate like jerks, but, and this is a big off set for me, my vet buddy that inspired the giveaway, they did real good for him and his family, good I saw firsthand.  In that way I take their behavior like the arrogant surgeon who saved my life--you can be a jerk if you get the job done well.  Still this one bothers me, though.

4.  The Gun Thing

I am a supporter of the Second Amendment.  Unlike quite a few people that are, I have actually tested and used the Second Amendment in legal proceedings on a few occasions.   The Second Amendment is important to my clients and it is important to me.  But I know there are people that have different points of view on this issue and I am not going to base my associations or affiliations on where folks, or charities, stand on guns, abortion, religion, vaccines, school testing, or any political hot button issue.  


Frankly, politicians and special interests love these issues.  Politicians and special interests stoke the fires and keep the fights going because it means money and votes.  If folks want to be part of that, that's fine, but I refuse to be so crassly treated by those in power.  In the end I can get along with someone that has diametrically opposing political views, so long as that person is a decent person, because: 1) I realize that these "fundamental" issues are manufactured by elected officials and lobbying groups; 2) they are, generally speaking, historical accidents (in the 60s the NRA was supportive of gun control measures sponsored by Ronald Reagan after Black Panthers brought guns into the California legislature--positions on these so-called fundamental issues change as political expediency dictates); and 3) many of these issue don't relate to what makes a person or group good--I know lots of folks that hate guns that are decent people and I know a lot of folks that love guns that are decent people.  WWP position on taking money from firearms companies is fine with me so long as they help vets out and as I indicated before, I saw that help firsthand.  

In the end, the choice of WWP comes down to this--they are the single largest vet charity in the US.  They aren't perfect, they aren't even the best charity, but giving money to them helps the highest impact charity for vets.  I wish they were better, but waiting for perfect is always a problem.  ITS disagrees and he has reasons for doing so.  But for me, when I can direct my money some place, I want it to go where it will have the most impact. 






Now that the giveaway is over, toss out some suggestions for a replacement charity and I will do the due diligence on them. 
 

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Fire and Ice

A new video was posted to Vimeo last week.  It shows a traditional method of making pattern welded damascus steel.  The process is fascinating, of course, but this video takes things up a notch with a beautiful soundtrack and exquisite photography.  Take a look:

A French Story about Fire and Ice from Jean-Paul Girbal on Vimeo.


One of the folks associated with the video was kind enough to send it to me.

Of course, the winners' post will be up later today or early tomorrow.

Friday, May 22, 2015

Filip De Coene Mini Explorer WIP

My Filip De Coene Hybrid was one of my favorite knives.  It was also my first custom.  The fit and finish was beyond compare and even now, a dozen or so customs in, it still stands out.

IMG_0033

But alas I needed a lock or some kind of blade safety and so when I sold the Hybrid I promised myself that I'd circle back around and get one of Filip's locking blades.  The crown jewel of his knife pattern stable is the Explorer flipper, a titanium knife designed by Antoine Van Looke and based on an ancient fixed blade, not Oldowan old, but very, very old.  Van Looke's own fixed blade has a very rustic look to it, but when translated into De Coene's minimal high tech design aesthetic the result is striking.  The original Explorer was a big knife and I am not a fan of big folders.  So when I talked with Filip I asked him to make me a smaller version, a Mini.  A few years passed and he finally has space on his bench to make me a knife and we start talking.  All of the pictures below are from Filipe.

I am a huge fan of blue, so I wanted blue G10 scales.  I could have opted for carbon fiber, but the weight savings is minimal and bright blue G10 is quite striking.  He gave me the choice of a framelock or a liner lock and I picked a framelock, wanting to keep the knife as slim as possible (and yes, this will be a knife I use and carry).  Finally, unlike the original Explorer Filip designed, I wanted a clip on my because again, this will be a user.  The blade steel is going to be S30V, which is plenty good for me, especially with a heat treat that renders it a bit harder than Chris Reeve's S30V that comes in at 57-59 HRc.  Filip has been very diligent at keeping me up to date with pictures, so I thought I'd share them with you.

Here is a size comparison between the Mini Explorer and the full-sized version of the knife:

IMG_9006

Here is a shot of the Mini Explorer in hand alone for scale:

IMG_9008
 
Here the knife is being fitted for its blue G10 scale:

IMG_9031

The pivot was something we discussed and ultimately I decided not to go crazy and just get a basic pivot. This is not an ostentatious knife so the pivot is simple:

IMG_9063

By opting for the framelock the knife will be relatively thin:

IMG_9064

We were going to do an off the shelf clip, but as you can see, it wasn't working:

image1

In the end, despite my aversion to carved clips, the look required it:

IMG_9095

Filip isn't a "name" maker in the knife world, but his quality is top notch and his communication and flexibility in the process is amazing.  He doesn't make a ton of knives either, so its hard to get one from him, but the ones that are out there are pretty darn awesome.  I think this one will join those ranks.  Watch my Instagram or Youtube channel for this beauty to land in my possession. 

Last Few Days for WWP Giveaway

This is the last weekend to get in on the WWP giveaway.  I will be choosing the winners on Monday night.  Look for the post Tuesday.  Remember we have an additional Big Heart, the modded CQC-7 donated by Attorney Adrian and I will toss in the CRKT No Time Off as well.  That's a ton of loot and a good cause.  Here are the rules.

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Taxonomy and Terminology Change

After I posted a response to Knife Thursday's discussion on the definitions of customs v. midtechs v. production knives I continued to think about the problem.  The more I did, the more I was unsatisfied with the answer.  Additionally two other things happened.  First, the ever talented Allen Elishewitz posted this thread on the USN (membership required).  In case the link doesn't work search "Allen Elishewitz" and "Buyer Beware" on USN.  Second, Dave Curtiss of Curtiss knives posted a meme pic on his Instagram thread, making fun of people that pay $900 for a midtech knife.  These two things have led me to rethink how I view "custom knives" and forced me to rework how I talk about these blades.  This was all ahead of the Shamwari review, and once I am done clearing the ground, I will explain why they are related.

Check the old article for how I thought the custom v. midtech v. production terms should be defined.  Now here is the problem--customs aren't custom.  The vast majority of "custom" knives aren't made for a specific person, they aren't unique.  They are, generally, a set model that is handmade by a single person.  And so the categories I laid out before don't work.  There are true custom knives--knives made for a specific individual (I own one, the blade I designed and TT Pockettools made for me, see below), but this is generally not what knife knuts are talking about.  People want a Brad Blount Arrestor or an Andrew Demko AD-10.  These are knife models (patterns, to use the old term) handmade by a single person.  But they are not customs in any sense of the word as used by regular people.  They might be handmade, but they are not singular designs.  They are similar in the vast majority of ways to all of the other Arrestors or AD-10 (that is, in fact, how we recognize them).  That's the problem.

Now here is the solution. When knife knuts talk about "custom knives" we are distinguishing a given knife from a production knife based on two primary qualifications--how something was made and who made it.  If something is made by robots it is different from a handmade knife.  And if something is made by an army of people on an assembly line it is different from a single source knife.  What knife knuts want is a knife that is handmade AND made by a single person--they generally do not get a knife that is unlike any other knife and handmade by a single person.  So the word "custom" doesn't work.  With those two axes--handmade and single source--laid out, we can solve this linguistic puzzle quickly and more correctly than in my first attempt.

Handmade, single source:

IMG_7474

This is like a Yuna knife--it is a knife made with basic hand and power tools by a single person with all of the parts, even screws, made by that person.  These are extremely rare.  I know that Allen makes knives like this some of the time, but the only person I know of that ALWAYS makes all of his parts is Yuna.  I suppose you could be a real stickler and require them to mine the ore to make the steel, but short of that, the creator of the knife made everything him- or herself.

Single Source:

IMG_0026

This is a Curtiss (that's his Nano above), Grimsmo, or Tighe knife--it is a knife made with advanced machinery by a single person.  Obviously, the definition of "advanced machinery" is going to change over time, but the point is, Dave and Brian have machines that even hobbyist knife makers don't have.  In many ways I think this is more impressive than a handmade knife, the Norseman is a beautiful blade, but it is different from what you get with a Yuna.  

Handmade:

P1000017

This is like a Gavko or Tuff Knives knife--it is a knife where the majority of parts and processes are done by a single person, but some things, like cutting lockbar blanks, screw making, and/or heat treat is done by someone else.  The vast majority of the "custom" knives out there right right fall into this category and it is obviously a spectrum--Charles Gedraitis imports only his screws, as does Steve Karroll, while Gareth Bull, Gavko, and Tuff Knives all have lock bars water jetted. 

Midtech:

P1040831

This is like my GMT Stubby Razel or the Tolk--it is a knife where the majority of parts and processes are done by someone other than the knifemaker, but the final steps--lock fitting, grind, and the like, are done by the knifemaker.  There is a spectrum in handmade knives and at some point, let's say 50.1% to be arbitrarily specific, that the knife ceases to be a handmade object and more of a production piece.  So long as the knifemaker still lays hands on each blade in a meaningful way, more than say, assembling finished parts, its a midtech; if not, it is a production piece.

Production:

P1000211

This is like the Spyderco Zulu--it is a knife where the design and production of the knife are handled by entirely different people or groups of people.  In the most extreme you get something like Cold Steel knives or the OEM blades from Spyderco, Kershaw, or Boker--the designer creates "blueprints" sends them to the big company and they then outsource them to an OEM overseas.  Cold Steel, to my knowledge, does not make ANY knives, they just handle the design and marketing of them.  Spyderco, Kershaw, and Benchmade still make some knives, but all three outsource designs to OEMs for production.  If you wanted to be unnecessarily specific you could distinguish between in-house productions like the Spyderco Paramilitary 2 (designed in the US by Spyderco and made in the US also by Spyderco) and outsourced productions (like the Kershaw Zing G10, designed by RJ Martin, produced by Kershaw and made by an overseas OEM).

Custom:

P1040493

A bespoke piece, unique and made for a single person.  You can have a handmade, single source custom, a single source custom, and so on...

Mods:

You can have modded versions of the above as well, though most folks mod production knives.  Generally I think of mods in two camps--light and heavy.  A light mod is something like a scale swap or refinish on the blade.  Here is my old Buck Advantage, modded by Thuff Thumbz:

IMG_0033

A heavy mod involves a rework of the basic design, something like Smock Knives Mini Southard:

P1040669

There are tough cases, like a Liong Mah designed handmade custom, but the taxonomy can handle that--its just a handmade piece.  The Todd Begg Field Grade Bodegas are more complicated.  We don't know exactly how much Todd does on each knife, but merely supervising others is not enough to make it a midtech. It is probably just a very nice production knife.  

Examining this taxonomy again has led me to a single point--the problem isn't with the terms, but the lack of disclosure on the part of knifemakers.  We, the customers, should know just how much a knife maker does when producing a knife, especially midtechs.  The better makers are very forthcoming with this information--Graham was up front with how much he did on the GMT Stubby Razels (lockbar fitting and edge grinding) and Gareth was very up front about the Shamwari when I asked him.  But some are less up front and that, more than the terms themselves, is a problem.  

The Shamwari is a bit of an anomaly in the knife world--it is made in waves or batches like custom lights are.  This means that instead of one or two at a time, the Shamwaris are all made at once.  As a woodworker I can see the utility in this.  When I make something with drawers I don't make one drawer and fit it in the carcass, then go back and make another.  I batch them out.  The efficiency of performing the same task with the same tools and same set up is undeniable.  I can make four drawers in 150% the time it takes me to make one.  The set up and lay out are BY FAR the most time consuming steps in the process.  The actual cutting and fitting is relatively quick.  So making knives in batches of 10 or 12 makes sense.  In fact, I don't know why more makers don't do this.  If you listen closely you'll hear a common refrain among knife makers--they get tired of doing the same thing over and over.  Maybe if they make blades in batches, the monotony would be less.

The second thing about the Shamwaris is that they have pre-cut lock bars.  Everything else, the blades, the handles, the clips, even the washers, are handmade by a single person.  The only other part made by someone else are the screws (screws are almost always made by someone else, except on a Yuna and a few others).  As such, I think it is fair to classify the Shamwari as a handmade knife, under the taxonomy above.

The industry is as a weird point because of the massive influx of cash and attention.  Production companies are making truly superior knives, like the ZT0454.  Conversely, everyone and their mother is claiming to be a custom knife maker and these folks are putting out some crude stuff. Finally there is the most pernicious of problems--custom makers releasing midtechs.  Allen is right--assembling finished parts does not make you a knife maker and that does not make a knife a midtech, any more than assembling furniture from pieces in a box from Ikea makes you a woodworker.  The knife maker has to do something important on the knife to make it a midtech.  Otherwise it is a production blade. 

Again this all has to do with disclosure.  The more disclosure the better, for everyone.  Calling things handmade when they are midtechs or midtechs when they are production knives devalues all of the categories of knives.  Hademade knives are special.  They demand a lot of work and they should command a lot of money.  Calling things that aren't handmade devalues that.  In the long run, the knife maker that does this hurts him or herself.  If they start out making "handmade" knives that are really midtechs, but then later develop the skill to do real handmade stuff, how are they going to tell their customers and make people think their new, actual handmade knives are worth paying a premium?  The answer is they can't. 

Disclosure is important, but hopeful a more clear and consistent language will help a bit.  I'll try to stick to these categories in reviews and hopefully they'll catch on in the knife community, but I doubt it.  Playing fast and loose with language can make a person a few extra bucks, even if it hurts them in the long run. 

Saturday, May 16, 2015

Gareth Bull Shamwari Review

I have been looking for a knife like the Shamwari for a very, very long time.  I like the Sebenza a lot, but I really want a flipper version.  When I found the Shamwari I knew I had what I wanted.  This is a clean knife--a really clean knife.  Looking through the normal sources for custom knives was unsuccessful.  As a South African knife maker, many of the custom sites, which are US-based, don't have a huge stock of Gareth Bull's blades.  After this I went to the forums and again struck out.  There weren't a whole lot of Shamwaris or Warlocks (his other model) to be found.  Then I got a tip from a friend that there were a run of Shamwaris in the works.  I instantly put my name on the books.
In many ways this knife is the culmination of years of searching.  I wanted a clean, simple flipper.  But today's market doesn't produce a whole lot of those knives.  The fact that the knife is a front flipper is a huge plus, cleaning up the profile even more.  By now you know that I am a minimalist when it comes to both carry and looks.  Simply put--there is no knife that is a locking flipper more minimal in appearance that this.  The only flourish (which I wish was not on the knife) is the proprietary fastener on the pivot.  Other than that, aesthetically, I couldn't have asked for more, or less, depending on your point of view.  

There is no product page or website, though there is a Gareth Bull Knives Facebook page, found here.  This run of Shamwari knives costs $550 (NOTE: I mistakenly listed the price as $450) each direct from the maker.  There are no written or video reviews of this run and they are different enough from previous runs to make other videos unhelpful.   Here is my video overview of the knife:

Here is my review sample:

P1050399

Twitter Review Summary:  Clean, calculated, and clever.

Here is my video overview:


Maker Feedback

My experience with Gareth Bull Knives was splendid.  A friend tipped me off that his books were open, I contacted him and I received an email response within 8 hours (pretty good given the time difference, he is in South Africa).  We then went back and forth I placed an order for his second batch.  He then contacted me a few days later and said that the someone dropped out of the first batch and he had a knife to spare.  I jumped on that and had the knife in hand about a week and half after emailing for the first time.  The communication was excellent and the speed of the transaction was quick.

Some research found complaints on various fora that there have been serious backlogs with Gareth Bull Knives, so bad that he was kicked out of the South African Knife Maker's Guild.  I put this question to the man himself and here is his answer:

As to the Guild story. Yes, there is truth to it. In short, I overextended myself and started falling massively behind on orders (orders with deposits paid mind you). Understandably people became concerned and those concerns were put to the SA Guild. After chatting to the heads of the guild, it was decided that I should bow out until such time as I have all my back orders fulfilled, I intend to re-join and have been assured that there's a spot waiting for me, all in good time.

This is not a great thing, of course, but two things make me think this is a thing of the past--the complaints originated three years ago and since that initial blip I can't find anything.  There have been no recent complaints and if my experience was representative it is easy to see why the complaints have dried up.  Second, the maker was quite forthcoming.  He tackled the issue directly and gave me a direct answer.  I can't vouch for the maker, but I can tell you my experience was great and my research gives me confidence in dealing with him.  

Is this a "custom"?

I posed this question to the maker and here is his response:

Hi Tony

I consider these to still be handmade. I did use waterjet to cut the blanks for the handles. From there everything else is 100% handmade (save the screws of course:)). The blades, clips and even the bronze washers are handmade. This is the new generation of the Shamwaris, an easy identifier being the screws running through the stop pin, and the milled clip (previous iterations had hidden screws and bent clips).


Design: 2

I imagine that there was a CAD drawing on a computer somewhere with all of the standard features of a pocket knife--thumb stud, traction jimping, a busy swooping handle...you know the sort.  Gazza, this knife's maker, highlighted each feature and played around with it.  After a few painful sessions at the keyboard of highlighting and changing, he just got fed up and clicked the "Delete" button.  The feature vanished and somehow the knife still worked.  He did again and again until in the end, he was left with the Shamwari.  A quick expansion of the rear tang, enough to make the knife a front flipper, and all of sudden you get what has to be one of the cleanest, most resolute, and useful knives I have ever used.

P1050401

But is not clean for its own sake--the design is still fully capable.  There is a very tight run of jimping on the spine of the blade its usual place and it is great.  The clean look makes for a good cutter in hand with little to cause hotspots.  The only thing, literally the only thing, that I dislike about the design of Shamwari is the choice of a proprietary pivot screw.  

ASIDE

Knife makers, I get it. I do. The ability to put your own spin, your own touch on a pivot is fun.  Screws are a boring, workman-like part of crafting a knife, and having talked to a few of you I know you HATE the process of making or selecting screws.  So when you get the chance, you want to do something--FUN.  Well, from the user point of view, this flourish is always, always an annoyance.  A knife is a tool, first and foremost.  To make part of it hard to use, on purpose, is to thwart that essential nature.  And is unnecessary.  There are quite a few good, decorative pivots on production knives that still have normal fasteners inside all of the flourish.  Look at knives like the Kershaw Injection or the Zero Tolerance ZT0450.  It can be done.  And remember--you are making all of our knives with things worse than Whitworth bolts.  Next time you go to the mechanic, ask them how much they enjoy working on cars and trucks with Whitworth bolts.  

P1050392

END ASIDE

Since there is no product page, here are the specs that matter: the knife weighs 3.36 ounces.  The blade is 3.125 inches with a cutting edge of exactly 3 inches.  The handle is just under 4.125 inches.  The blade is just under 1 inch tall at its tallest point.  These numbers result in quite competent performance ratios.  The b:h is .76 (rounding up) and the b:w is .93.  Both are above average.  

Fit and Finish: 2

Break in periods on knives make me nervous.  Especially ones with really rapid break ins. I am always worried about two things.  First, I am worried that this notion of break in is merely a way for knife makers to pass off shoddy work and delay complaints.  Second, I am worried that the knife might continue to break it, past smooth, into downright sloppy.  Well, I am here to report that neither of those things happened with the Shamwari. It did have a potent break in period where the lock was VERY sticky.  I used both the pencil trick and the Sharpie trick and both had only marginal impacts on what was the stickiest lock I had ever used.  Then, one day, as if by magic, the lock started to open like a vault.  Since then, for about two months now (hence the delay with the review), it has stayed exactly where it was--solid but smooth.

The rest of the knife is really immaculate, and given the spare appearance, it had to be.  The blade is dead centered, even though this photo makes it look like it leans away from the lock side.  The blade has a very coarse stonewash on it.  And the handle has again, a very coarse stonewash.  If you look at the photo above you can see a massive scratch in the handle scale. That  was there when I got the knife.  And there are little scratches like that all over the knife.  It is part of the stonewashing.  The maker does offer other finishes, but be aware, his stonewashing is super aggressive.  I like it quite a bit, much better than the matte finish on a Sebenza where every scratch and use mark stands out like its highlighted, but if you are fussy about your knives, think about a different finish.

P1050397

Grip: 2

A grippy finish, good handle shape, a run of extra fine jimping, and a good index notch make the Shamwari a persistent tool in the hand--it ain't going anywhere. 

P1050395

Its hard to imagine something more locked in than the Shamwari without using some of the gimmicks out there--like trac tape inserts.  

Carry: 2

With its slim figure and rounded off shape, the Shamwari is an excellent pocket companion.  I have an issue with the clip, but aside from that, its a perfect gentleman, never bullying the other things in your pocket.

Steel: 2

N690 is a widely used steel in Europe and Africa.  Its exceptionally corrosion resistant, almost to the level of "seaworthy" steels like H1. I found that it was excellent in use, like an improved VG10, which is not surprising because the formulas (formulae for all you grammar and Latin nerds) are similar.  I found that it did not chip or roll as much as VG10.  N690 just might be the most advanced of the non-powder steels, the last innovation before steels were made on the molecular level.  

Blade Shape: 2

Bob Loveless got so much right, but the most lasting of his contributions is this blade shape: 

P1050393

The drop point is not only a perfect utility shape, it is also (especially in this rendition), quite visually appealing.  I found that not only did the blade look nice, the lack of thumb stud, flipper tab, or thumb hole made it especially good at working material.  I could choke up or hold the blade by the spine only and not worry about where my fingers were (sort of....its still a knife) or whether the material was going to get jammed somewhere. 

Grind: 2

The  Shamwari's grind is, like the entire knife, simple, refined and excellent.  The blade is symmetrical from side to side and the plunge line is excellent and even on both sides.  The main grind is a hollow grind that gets very thin behind the edge.  The cutting bevel itself is quite thin, something I don't prefer with my rudimentary sharpening skills, but it cuts quite well.

Deployment Method: 2

We get to the interesting part of knife--the front flipper.  I am not going to say that this was easy when I first got the knife, but a few days after the Shamwari arrived I had the motions down to both snap it open and slow roll it.  It is now my preferred form of flipping and rivals the Spyderhole as my favorite deployment method.  This is a great design, truly great.  

Retention Method: 2

Hmmmm...I am not so sure I like the trend towards sculpted clips.  This is a gorgeous clip, simple and straightforward.  But it lacks the snap-to-the-frame feel that a spring clip does.  It works well and looks nice, but I think the trend will eventually give way to function.

Lock: 2

The frame lock is stable, engages easy and disengages.  The overtravel stop is not just effective but it is also quite nice looking. There is nothing to complain about here but the aforementioned stick lock that was an issue during the 4 or 5 day break in period.  

P1050394

Overall Score: 20 out of 20

I am a petty bastard.  I am not awarding this knife a perfect score because of the proprietary pivot screw.  Unlike the clip, which is merely a preference, the pivot screw is an objective flaw.  Other than that, this is a wonderful and unique piece of cutlery.  It has made me sell other knives, knives that with the Shamwari around stand 0% chance of being used or carried.  Especially sublime are the blade shape and the deployment.  This is a thoughtlessly good flipper, among the best I have handled, and a truly compelling argument that we, the American knife buying public, got it wrong when it comes to flipper design.  I originally thought of this as an even cleaner looking Sebenza, but in the end I have come to like this knife as its own thing--a marvelous EDC at an excellent price for a handmade blade.

If you get a chance, save your pennies and get a Shamwari, it is a ridiculously sweet knife, something I both like on an intellectual level and something that gives me a bit of delight every time I take it out of my knife case and slip it into my pocket.  This is one of my favorite blades, right up there with the Dragonfly and the 940-1 and the Paramilitary 2.  Its certainly my favorite custom I own.  But more on that word "custom" next week.

Here is a sweet light&saber duo:

IMG_8606

Monday, May 11, 2015

Did We Pick the Wrong Flipper Design?

In the 1980s, once the US Supreme Court cleared the way, the home video recording market exploded.  Two competing formats vied for consumer dollars--VHS and Betamax.  Betamax was a proprietary tape system developed by Sony.  VHS was developed by Matsushita (Panasonic's parent company) and JVC and licensed to anyone that wanted to make a machine.  On paper, Betamax should have wiped the floor with VHS.  The video quality was better, the tapes were smaller, they could have a longer record time (5 hours on Beta III tapes) and the machines were better made.  But in the end the market famously picked VHS.  This was not the first nor the last format war in electronics (MiniDisc versus DCC was especially terrible--the formats killed each other), but it is probably the most famous because the clearly inferior product won and dominated the market.

In the knife world the flipper deployment method has taken the market by storm.  If you watch Jim Skelton's videos you might think that there is no other way to open a knife other than a flipper.  But the reality is there are multiple ways to open a knife and, in fact, multiple flipper designs.  Two work fundamentally the same, the traditional flipper tab flipper and the exposed bottom tang flipper (as seen on Dietz modded Kwaikens and Smock Knives upcoming SK23).  The third kind of flipper, the so-called front flipper, works fundamentally differently.  I have had two knives with a front flipper design, the barely passable Boker Exskelimor and the amazing Gareth Bull Shamwari.  In my short time with the Shamwari, it has done a good job of convincing me that perhaps we as a knife community have chosen the wrong flipper design.  Its not as clearly superior as Betamax was to VHS, but it does have some big advantages.  Here is my video on the flipper differences:


By the way, I have practiced more and the Shamwari opens every single time without fail.  Its an issue of muscle memory not design.  

Advantage #1: Looks

Traditional flipper tab flippers can be very nice looking knives, but there is simply no way around it--the tab itself breaks up the profile of the knife.  It, by design, juts out of the knife.  Lots of folks have made that element something interesting or nice.  Some try to hide it.  Some use it as a quillion or guard.  But there is no doubt--the flipper tab itself is something knife designers have to work around and work with, it can't be ignored.  

A front flipper, on the other hand, does very little to disrupt the visual flow and design of a folder.  In fact, many knives that aren't front flippers have exposed tangs like a front flipper does. The Sebenza, for example, appears to have something of a front flipper tang.  There is no alteration or consideration for the tab in the design of the handle either.  No swoops, indexing notches, or guards are necessary.  Both in terms of design and look, a front flipper greatly reduces problems that arise from the use of a traditional flipper tab flipper.

Advantage #2: Speed Control

With a properly designed front flipper (no the Boker ones do not count) you can both roll the knife open and snap it open, something that is very hard to do with most tab flippers.  The reason is simple--in a tab flipper, you are overcoming the detent to deploy the knife.  Here you are overcoming a detent, but you are also working around the pivot screw.  Because of that, the knife doesn't need to have such a strong detent.

You can slow roll or snap open a thumb stud knife or a thumb hole knife, which is one of the reasons I still like them despite the ease, fun, and elegance of a tab flipper.  But having tried this flipper it gives you all of the joy of a tab flipper and the speed control of other deployment methods.  And really, do you want to be the jackass in Target that snaps open a blade to slice open a bag of fruit snacks (why all of my examples involve Target and fruit snacks, I have no idea...actually wait, I do).  

Advantage #3: Easy Carry

Pulling tab flippers in and out of your pocket isn't THAT big of a hassle, but it is a hassle.  Every once in a while something will get caught and maybe, just maybe, the knife will deploy in pocket, which is a good way to ruin your day.  This isn't a huge issue.  The hassle factor is small and the accidental deployment, with a properly detented blade, is like zero, but some chance compared to no chance is a big deal.

If the front flipper didn't work as well as the tab flipper, I'd say easy of carry is a tie, but the good front flippers do (look, bad flippers of either kind just stink).  Given that, why mess around?

I am not sure tab flippers are inherently inferior, but having a good front flipper around, like the Gareth Bull Shamwari (review coming next) makes it hard to avoid that conclusion.  What I am 100% confident about is that US knife knuts have severely underrated the benefits and fun of a front flipper.  Based on the quality of the design it should be a 50/50 market share (at least) and it is nothing like that.  Perhaps front flippers are harder to make on a production level.  I am not sure what the answer is, but what is clear is that tab flippers shouldn't be the only game in town.  





Friday, May 8, 2015

Zero Tolerance ZT0450 Review

The ZT0454 is one of the most impressive knives I have ever handled.  It blows away almost everything--custom or production--that I have been lucky enough to put my mitts on.  The size, the blade, the flipping action, all of it was superlative.  But in the end, it was too big for me to keep, too bulky for an EDC, and since I am not a collector the Beautiful Beast came and went.  Part of me was sad as it was such a sweet blade, if it were only a bit smaller and I would have kept it.  Then after SHOT Show 2015, I learned that ZT did have a smaller version in store for us and I was elated.

After two hundred or so gear reviews, I don't get super excited anymore when I get a package.  I still love getting packages, don't get me wrong, but the hands-quivering moments are few and far between.  When I slid the ZT0450 out of its package, it was one of those moments.  This is a beautiful knife and the promise of a ZT0454 in a small, carry-capable package made me stoked.  After a while carrying and using the knife I can tell you that some of that enthusiasm has waned.  This isn't a perfect knife.  Is it worth your money?  Probably, but man is the market crowded right now.  

Here is the product page. The ZT0450 costs $160. There aren't a whole lot of good written reviews on the knife. Here is an excellent video review from Epic Snuggle Bunny, one of my favorite YouTube reviewers (note that we both have the same problems). Here is a link to Blade HQ, where you can find the ZT0450, and all proceeds benefit the site when you purchase things through this link:

Blade HQ

and here is a link where you can buy the knife at Knives Ship Free:

KnivesShipFree

Here is my review sample (purchased with my own money):

P1050599

Twitter Review Summary: Great in many ways but one.

Here is my video overview of this knife:



Design: 2

This is a Dmitri Sinkevich design and an obvious homage to the epic ZT0454.  The lines are distinctly organic and the overall size is just about perfect for a midsized blade.  I like small blades, like the Dragonfly, but in the Mini Grip/Delica/Skyline group the ZT0450 fits in quite nicely.  The overall appearance is quite classy, with the stonewashed titanium handle, the two toned blade, and the uber slick polished pivot (custom makers please take note this is how you upscale a pivot, not by making it a proprietary fastener).  ZT, as they always do, hit all the bullet points--a lanyard hole, dual position clip, and good jimping.  Overall, the knife looks good and yet, despite the wave of titanium frame lock flippers, it looks unique.  That is quite the feat by ZT, Thomas, Jim McNair, and Dmitri Sinkevich.  Tip of the hat, fellas, this one is an awesome design.   

P1050597

Size wise the design awesomeness continues.  The knife is slender in the pocket and weighs a svelte 2.9 ounces.  The difference between this and ZTs of old is striking--this is a knife that is meant to be carried in a pocket of normal people, as opposed to in the pack of a commando (or commando wannabe) somewhere.  The performance ratios reflect the overall slender package.  The b:h is .79, better than the SOG Flash I, a knife known for its compact dimensions.  The b:w is excellent as well at 1.12, compared to say the Cold Steel Mini Recon I, which was a .83, this again is well above par and testament to the design's grace and greatness.  Here is the ZT0450 on top of the Badge of Hipsters a.k.a. Field Notes:

P1050612

Its not the Al Mar Hawk, but then again nothing has even come close to that rarefied air.  For non-Al Mar Knives this as good as it gets.

Fit and Finish: 2

Look at the pivot/lock interface area:

P1050604

Its clean, every cut is precise and chamfered, and the pivot gleams.  This is a gorgeous, gorgeous knife.  Even the monochromatic look of the knife is broken up tastefully, as the ZT0450 borrowed some standoffs from the Kershaw Ruby (ironic, isn't, that one of the ugliest knives in history lent out pieces to one of the most tastefully done blades on the market?).

P1050602

As with all things ZT, this sucker is just dialed in.  Its well made and amazingly executed (mostly...see Deployment below). 

Grip: 2

Sinkevich's knives really work in the hand.  Everything seems like it is in JUST the right place.

P1050610

The index finger notch is good and the rest of the handle falls into place.  Its especially nice to have something of a small parrot's beak at the end of the handle to gather everything up into the right spot.  Dmitri knows what he is doing folks.

Carry: 2

Thin, not so tall, and just the right length the ZT0450 carries well. The pocket clip is positioned in the right place and there is little to no pendulum effect. 

P1050601

I like this knife in the pocket almost as much as I like it in the hand.

Steel: 2

Though I hope that the Internet tomfoolery over Elmax didn't scare KAI away from that excellent steel, S35VN is a perfectly great steel in its own right.  I like this steel and always have.  Not much more to write. 

Blade Shape: 2

Its basically a drop point, but a stylized version of that blade, a particularly good looking version too.

P1050607

I am not 100% convinced that the swedge is necessary or even beneficial (more on that below) but the overall shape and look is again unique and well done.

Grind: 1

Geez...I thought, I hoped, I wished that this thing could slice, but just couldn't. It did okay with wood making feather sticks quite adeptly, but put into a food prep role, it failed miserably.  It cracked apples apart instead of cutting them and it made an absolute mess out of some cheeses I cut.  I am not sure if it was the swedge that forced the main grind down the blade, thus making it a much steeper grind, or if it just the thickness of the steel.  Either way, I was hoping for a ZT that finally could cut like a Spyderco.  Alas, it was close, but not quite there.  Comparatively, the Paramilitary 2 was a deli counter machine and that's a shame because it has both a thicker blade and a longer blade.  Close, but not quite ZT. 

Deployment Method: 0

The effusive praise for the ZT0450 is now at an end.  This knife doesn't flip well at all.  Unless you get the EXACT right purchase on the handle the knife just won't deploy.  The detent is quite strong and when you place your fingers on the lock bar, the detent engages too much and no amount of pressure on the flipper tab will kick the knife open.  

P1050606

Once you get the hang of it, once your fingers of placed EXACTLY right, you can pop the knife open with lightning speed.  Once you get the hang of it, it deploys much like the Tim Gaylean custom I handled a few knife shows ago with its kinetic opening.  That knife was the best flipper I have ever opened.  This knife isn't.  You shouldn't have to "get the hang" of a flipper.  Its intuitive nature is the primary basis for its appeal.    

Retention Method: 2

For a company that doesn't care much about clips, this is ANOTHER good clip.  Its simple and clean.  It doesn't look like a billboard and it is not a paint scraper.  Pretty darn good.   

Lock: 2

Like a lot of ZT features, the lock here is dialed in.  The integrated overtravel stop and the user-replaceable (though I question how this happens as they are not available for sale) lock interface is clever and simple.  The engagement and disengagement is silky smooth.  The stability is amazing. 

Overall Score: 17 out of 20

Whatever else, I can't help shake the fact that this knife would be a better knife if it were a liner lock instead of a frame lock.  This blade, with carbon fiber scales on both sides, would be amazing, fixing the major problem with the knife.  And I want to be clear--while you can learn to deploy the knife despite the finicky flipper, its bad, quite bad.  And unlike what a lot of folks contend online, this is not a problem related to being a small frame lock flipper.  My Graham Stubby Razel GMT is smaller in every dimension and still flips fine regardless of grip.  This is a design or product flaw in my opinion, one that should be fixed.  As it is, you can work around it, but let's not get too crazy here--while $160 isn't what it used to be in the knife world, that is still a pretty penny and well beyond the price range where you have to worry about something as basic as deployment.  The rest of the knife is a gem, for sure.  Lots of folks will love this knife, even if they concede the flipping action is terrible.  For me, I prefer slicier blades than this, but that's more preference than problem.  This is a very competent knife with one big flaw--a Mercedes that has a driver's door that is hard to open.  Not a deal breaker, but it holds the knife back from being the game changer I thought it would be. 

The Competition

Compared to the SOG Mini Aegis, the ZT0450 is in a different league.  But, within that bracket, boy is competition stiff.  The Kizer Ki-3404 is just a better knife--same materials but fewer flaws for less money.  If both were equally good, I'd always opt for the USA-made ZT0450, even with its $40 premium, but they aren't equally good--the Ki3404 is a vastly better flipper and somewhat better cutter.  The Benchmade Valet is also in this price range and while it too has some flaws, it has a superior steel in M390 and it is a bit more pocketable.  And while the Native 5 FRN version isn't as classy, it is a better slicer, with the same steel, and available at 50% the price. Here is the real killer though--I like the ZT0770CF much better.

In a vacuum, this is a good to great knife.  Problem is, right now there are a lot of knives in that quality range that are cheaper than this one or knives that are a step up that are the same price.  The fact that the ZT0450 wouldn't be my first choice isn't, however, a reflection on the knife itself, but really the insanely awesome market right now.    

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

One ends and another begins

The #TADventures contest was a success.  The winner is: chorizoisgood with his beautiful canopy shot from April 19, 2015.  There were 58 entries and some were amazing.  Mike Rixman gets special bonus points for his blatant use of a cute kid outside, something I am particularly susceptible to. 

Thanks to Triple Aught Design and the Goddness of Gear, Raquel Donati for donating the awesome Burke Dog Tag. 

Chorizoisgood, drop me an email at everydaycommentary at gmail dot com in the usual format.  I send the Dog Tag and patches out ASAP.

With that bit of business finished, let's move on to the next contest.  

Well, its May and Memorial Day is coming up, so its time to pay our respects with another bi-annual WWP giveaway.

Here is how this will work:

1.  Go to the Wounded Warriors website.

2.  Make a charitable donation of at least $5.

3.  When you receive the donation receipt email, forward it to me WITH AN UNALTERED SUBJECT LINE (I need to have the subject lines be the same so I can sort them easily, you can delete any payment or other info in the body of the email if you want).  Altered subject line emails will not be counted.  Not only will I not be able to see them to sort them, but this provides a modicum of authentication that the donation was actually made. Send it to this address:

everydaycommentary at gmail dot com

in the normal format.  DELETE ALL OF THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN THE EMAIL, but if you could, please indicate how much you donated.  A larger amount won't make it more likely that you win one of the two grand prizes, but I want to keep track so that I can have a total.  I am always working on another giveaway and this data would be a nice selling point to make that one happen. 

4. I will pick four winners on Memorial Day 2015 (May 25) as follows:

a) EDC Kit #1: chosen at random.  Kit #1 includes:

--James Chapter Knife, Storm Trooper Colorway (courtesy of the blog)
--Prometheus Beta QR v2 (Scout Leather Polished Brass Edition)(courtesy of Prometheus)
--RC Fibers D15 Wallet and CF Clip (courtesy of RC Fibers)
--TT Keeper OPMT (courtesy of TT PockeTTools)
--Karas Kustoms Ink (courtesy of Karas Kustoms)
--Mini Mechanics chest EDC storage (courtesy of the blog)

b) EDC Kit #2: chosen at random.  Kit #2 includes:

--Zero Tolerance ZT770CF (courtesy of www.knivesshipfree.com)
--Malkoff MDC (courtesy of the blog)
--Bellroy  Elements Pocket (courtesy of Bellroy)
--Prometheus EKO OMPT (courtesy of Prometheus)



c) Big Heart, awarded to the person with the single largest donation:

--One of a kind, Smock Knives modded Boker Kwaiken with Dietz Flipper (courtesy of the blog)

By the way, good luck getting one of these so other way.  The vaporize on the forum boards, Dietz has vanished and Smock is making his own stuff.  This one is pretty bitchin' too in translucent green G10:
IMG_8055

d) Veteran only, awarded to a veteran chosen at random (vets do not need to donate to enter, you've done enough, simply send me an email with the subject line of "EDC Veteran's Day Giveaway--Vet" and in the body of the email include confirmation information--such as a service ID number or a picture of your military ID).
--Zero Tolerance ZT0562 (courtesy of www.knivesshipfree.com)
--Arno Bush Baby Anniversary Edition (courtesy of www.knivesshipfree.com)

This year, to spur donations, I am giving away some small prizes for biggest donation in a given week.  Note that these wins DO NOT remove the winner from the Big Heart prize. 

e) Week 1 biggest donation:

--Kershaw Amplitude 2.5 (courtesy of the blog)

f) Week 2 biggest donation:

--Spyderco Cat (courtesy of the blog)

g) Week 3 biggest donation:
--Casey Lynch Paramilitary 2 upgrade kit (includes new custom scales and over the top pocket clip)(courtesy of Casey Lynch, who needs a website for me to link to)
h) Smallest donation (chosen at random if needed):

--Buck Mini Spitfire (courtesy of the blog)

Again, the amount of the donation doesn't matter (except for the Big Heart and Weekly prizes) and large donations won't be counted more than once.   Multiple donations from the same person will be counted as one entry (please try not to do that, it makes tallying stuff up difficult).  I guess you could cheat, by faking a donation receipt email or pretending to be a vet, but hopefully if you do you will be enjoying your free gear on the slow, hot elevator ride to Hell.  I'll post how much we raise once everything is tallied.

The contest will begins today.  You can donate whenever so long as it is more than $5.

Let's do this.  Spread the word, too.
Thanks for participating.  All prizes, including the weekly winners, will be distributed at the end of the contest.   

And for your edification and as proof of transparency (noting that the total is near the cost of an Omega Aqua Terra Co-Axial...):

Giveaways from Everyday Commentary thus far:

1.  Custom Benchmade Mini Grip 555hg with S30V steel ($130)
2.  Inkleaf Leather Moleskine Cover ($70)
3.  Iain Sinclair Cardsharp ($20)
4.  American Cutlery Over the Top Pocket Clip ($7)
5.  Boker Exskelibur II ($40)
6.  Coated Aircraft Cable ($3)
7.  RoBoT One Piece Multitool ($57)
8. Leatherman Sidekick ($30)
9. CRKT Ripple 2 ($30)
10. CRKT Mah Eraser ($100)
11. Steve Ku Quantum DD ($60)
12. LED Lenser M7R ($120)
13. Sunwayman M11R Mr. Elfin ($80)
14. ESEE Candiru ($50)
15. TT PockeTTools TT-7 ($30)
16. MBI CoreTi ($75) 
17. Ka-Bar Mini Dozier ($15)
18. CRKT Drifter G10 ($18)
19. CRKT Drifter SS ($18)
20. Lighthound 1xAAA light ($25)
21. Lighthound 1xAA light ($25)
22. McGizmo Haiku Hi CRI edition ($500) 
23. TAD Dauntless Mk. II ($350)
24. CRKT Enticer ($40)
25. CRKT Swindle ($50)
29. MBI HF-R with Zoom Head ($150)
30. Bellroy Note Sleeve Wallet ($90)
31. Spyderco Domino ($190)
32. Zebralight SC600 Mk. II ($100)
33. Tuff Writer Ultimate Red Clicky ($100)
34. TT PockeTTools 69 ($40)
35. TT PockeTTools Thumb Drive ($10)
36. TAD Gear Camo Dispatch Bag ($200)
37. Brous Blades Bionic ($180)
38. 2x Micro Systainer (courtesy of Woodcraft)($100 total, $50 each)
39. 2x Obtainum Wallet (courtesy of Obtanium Wallets)($400 total, $200 each)
40. Spyderco Dragonfly II in Super Blue (courtesy of the blog)($100)
41. Thrunite T10T Titanium (courtesy of the blog)($50)
42. Inspirs TTi 120 Pen (courtesy of Inspirs Designs)($100)
43. Kershaw Skyline with Blue G10 and Blackwash blade (1 of 211 made)(courtesy of the blog)($100)
44. oLight i2 EOS (with bolt on clip, out of production) (courtesy of the blog)($25)
45. Masterstroke Air Foil Twisty (courtesy of Masterstroke Pens)($75)

Total: $3948 given away thus far
Funds Raised for the WWP: roughly $1800 (NOTE: many of the giveaways in times past were not part of the WWP contests).

 

Saturday, May 2, 2015

RC Fibers D15 Wallet and Carbon Fiber Money Clip Review

Venture out of your comfort zone.  Andrew 2 (of Andrew 1 and Andrew 2 on the podcast, GGL's very own version of Thing 1 and Thing 2) always says this.  And with this review I did.  I am not a money clip guy.  NOT. A. MONEY. CLIP. GUY.  Perhaps it is the fact that I want to go against type and NOT be an Italian guy with a wad of cash in a money clip (both because I don't have a wad of cash and because I don't like money clips).  Perhaps it is the fact that money clips generally don't play well with other gear, are heavy, and feel like you are sitting on your keys if you keep it in your back pocket.  So when RC Fibers reached out to me, I was a little hesitant, then I remembered Andrew 2's advice and I said yes.

The kit they sent me included their hallmark item--a carbon fiber money clip--and a sleeve style wallet, much like by beloved Bellroy Card Sleeve.  Suffice to say I am very glad I followed Andrew 2's advice.  The wallet is nice, perfectly serviceable, but it was the ultra light, ultra thin carbon fiber money clip that really spoke to me during the review period.  

Here is the product page.  Here is a written review.  Here is the review sample of the two together (to be given away):

P1050423

Just the wallet:

P1050422

Just the money clip:

P1050424

Twitter Review Summary: Unlike PB&J probably better apart.

Design: 2

The wallet's size and cut are very familiar. The wallet is slightly larger than the Bellroy Card Sleeve, and it has a pocket in the back to accept the money clip.  Finally, the cut of the top most pocket allows you to show an ID without removing it, a huge plus in a wallet.  This wallet is stiffer than the the Bellroy.  The  leather is nice, not too thick and the stitching is adequate (though some contrast stitching would have been a nice visual touch).  When you have something as blingy as high polish carbon fiber to pair with the wallet, the contrast stitching is probably not necessary to bring the bling.  

The money clip is dead simple--a folded piece of thin carbon fiber.  The inside is left matte for grip purposes and the outside is a gleaming jewel of carbon fiber weave.  The design is simple and spectacularly eye catching. More than one person commented on how nice it looked. 

Here is a size comparison with the wallet: 

P1050441

and here is the size of the clip alone:
 
P1050439

Overall the size of both items was fine.  I'd prefer a slightly smaller wallet, but I understand that currency in other countries is bigger than ours.  Other that one issue, there is very little I'd change about the wallet or the clip.  That said, I am not sure how good both things are together.  They are just too thick and while I know its not really going to happen, I was worried that I'd crush the clip.  I get that is the premise of the entire package, but this is a case of the sum of the parts being greater than the whole.  The wallet is good.  The clip is good, but both together aren't amazing.  

Fit and Finish: 2

As someone that regularly reviews carbon fiber knives, I have lots of experience with carbon fiber, but RC Fibers stuff is on a different level.  It is, quite frankly, spectacular.  Here is an example of how polished it is:

P1050658

But more than just being eye catching, its quite functional.  It slides in and out of your pocket easily.  Additionally, the matte finish on the inside of the clip provides lots of traction.

The wallet has a similarly nice finish (no fit issues on the clip, its a single piece so there is nothing to fit together). The stitching is clean and even with no stray threads or frays.  The interior of the leather is quite nice.

Carry: 2 separately; 1 together

I strongly preferred the clip and the wallet separately.  The clip is the most minimal carry possible, even less than my Bellroy.  It added almost nothing to the weight and volume my daily carry.  Similarly, the wallet was only modestly larger than my Bellroy and in some applications I liked the stiffer letter better.  Together, I didn't like the thickness of the clip and wallet.  I also worried that something might pry the clip apart.  

Materials: 2

Two materials, both are quite nice.  The carbon fiber is especially glamorous.  While testing the wallet and clip out I got no less than three different random strangers complementing me on the clip.  It really is quite nice.

Accessibility: 2

Both the wallet and the clip allow a ton of access to the contents inside.  I really do prefer these sleeve style wallets to the bi- or trifold designs.  And money clips, well accessibility is the very reason they exist.

Appearance: 2

I am a definite fan of the look of both pieces and even the two of them together.  Maybe it was a few complements or the shine from the carbon fiber blinding me, but RC Fibers has a classy package here.

P1050665

No Spiderman wallet here, with enough traditional lines and materials to look adult.

Durability: 2

I am not going to fib you, I have been carrying and testing the two pieces for a month.  I am not sure how sturdy the carbon fiber clip is.  The wallet is leather and we all know how durable that is. But the carbon fiber FEELS durable.  It doesn't show a smidge of wear even on the edges or in the polish.  But keep in mind, a month is not a long term test.

Retention: 1

I wish the diagonal cut of the leather went all the way to the far side of the wallet, as the card in that slot (my ID usually) tended to fall out. It never completely dropped from the wallet, but it got close a few times.  I would imagine that if I used it for a longer time my ID would have surely dropped out. Not a good thing.  The wallet would score a 0 alone.
P1050661

But then there was the clip itself:

P1050660

I was sure this would never work. I was sure it wouldn't hold the stuff I jammed in it, especially with cards in it.  It never did.  It wasn't 100% stable, but it was surprisingly good.  When paired together, the retention was even better, as the clip pressed its contents against the much higher friction leather. 

Organization: 1

I am not convinced that pairing the wallet and clip make either better than they are alone, especially with the added thickness the clip and wallet represent. 

P1050662

Its not bad, with a more refined scale, it would get a 1.5, but I am just not certain the pair together are great and apart, they both have weaknesses.   The clip offers no organization at all, but you understand that going in.  The wallet, while similar to the Bellroy, isn't quite as refined, lacking the pull tab and the secure diagonal cut pocket.

Efficiency: 2

You aren't going to beat a clip for efficiency, its basically ALL storage.  The sleeve style wallet is a little less efficient, but not by much.  This is a high volume storage system.

Overall Score: 17 or 18 of 20

If you are a money clip guy and haven't seen the the RC Fibers' clip, you owe it to yourself.  I also think the wallet is pretty nice wallet, a slightly lesser design, compared to the Bellroy, but a bit cheaper.  Together, they don't offer much, if anything more than they do separately.  The clip is pretty killer and I am not a clip guy.  Thanks Andrew 2.